The rule set behind your result

v1.8 4 Aug 2026

• The biometrics question now asks whether the system recognises or infers people's emotions (Annex III point 1(c)). It was missing, so a system inferring emotions outside the workplace and education could be told it was not high-risk when the Act says it is.

v1.7 2 Aug 2026

• When determinative questions are still unanswered, your result now says so plainly: the class is named at its worst case rather than stated as settled, and the next steps are held back until you close them.
• Your obligations are never hidden while a result is provisional. They are relabelled as what would apply if the open questions resolve the worst way, and answering can only narrow the list.
• Every open question, and every follow-up task, now links straight to the question that raised it.
• You can re-assess a system without deleting it. Your previous answers are carried over, you are asked to confirm before the stored assessment is replaced, and the old one stays in the system's history.
• The downloadable report no longer states a verdict as settled when the screen has declined to.
• Fixed: un-checking a prohibited practice you had ticked no longer records that none of them apply.

v1.6 2 Aug 2026

• The eight prohibited practices (Art. 5) are now one screen instead of eight, and you can mark any of them 'not sure' rather than having to answer yes or no.
• The scope question split in two: whether the system is placed on the EU market, and whether its OUTPUT is used in the EU. A system built outside the EU whose output lands here stays in scope.
• The NCII question split into intent, reproducibility and safeguards, so a 'no' now says which of the three you are relying on.
• The Annex I question split into three, separating the product legislation, the safety-component test and the third-party conformity assessment.
• The Annex III high-risk areas are now asked by sub-limb, so your result names the specific point of Annex III that applies rather than the area.
• The Art. 25 substantial-modification question separates the change itself from whether it was foreseen in the original design.
• Every question about the AI-Act role you hold now asks it once, and the questions that follow are the ones that bind that role.

v1.5 2 Aug 2026

• You can now hold several operator roles at once, and your result shows every one of them with the duties attached to each.
• A substantial modification (Art. 25) now ADDS the provider's duties to the ones you already held, instead of replacing them.
• The four Art. 50 transparency questions are asked by role: providers are asked about 50(1) and 50(2), deployers about 50(3) and 50(4).
• Added a 'not sure which role we hold' answer. It raises the question for legal review and, until it is resolved, applies both the provider and the deployer duties.

v1.4 2 Aug 2026

• Added the AI-literacy question (Art. 4) and the training follow-up it raises.
• Added the Art. 111 transitional band, so a system already on the market before general application is told which timeline binds it.
• Added the Art. 25(4) component-supply question, which raises the provider's information duty to a downstream integrator.
• Added the Art. 54 authorised-representative question and the Art. 53 systemic-risk follow-up for GPAI-model providers.
• Added the Art. 6(1c) carve-out to the Annex I question: a product whose only third-party conformity trigger is a non-health-and-safety risk is no longer routed as high-risk on that basis alone. It requires supporting evidence.
• Your result and its export now state the intended purpose they were assessed against.

v1.3 1 Aug 2026

• A result now says how much of the determinative questionnaire it rests on, and which questions were left as Don't know.
• S-03 (the Art. 2 carve-outs) gained a Don't-know, and a Don't-know there no longer takes the system out of scope.
• Corrected the safety-component definition to the narrowed Omnibus test, and added the provider, deployer, intended-purpose and substantial-modification terms.
• Dropped the projected question total, which shrank as the walk narrowed, and labelled stages the walk skipped.
• Added the Annex I equivalence note, the SME penalty cap on prohibited results, and a Don't-know note carried onto the follow-up task and the export.

v1.2 1 Aug 2026

• Rewrote the question stems in plain language and separated our reading of a provision from the statute itself.
• Reframed every result headline as an indicative classification, stating the answers it rests on.
• Added the Art. 27(2) FRIA timing, the Annex VIII Section B filing, and the SME/SMC definitions and reliefs.

v1.1 1 Aug 2026

• Put Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI) in force: the amended dates below are now the binding ones.
• Relabelled the timeline columns so the binding column and the superseded 2024/1689 column are unambiguous.

v1.0 12 Jul 2026

• First published rule set: the post-Omnibus screening engine and its nine result nodes.